Monday, May 26, 2008

The Politics of Churchill Falls Power

Although recent public comments by Newfoundland and Labrador’s Minister of Natural Resources, Kathy Dunderdale, led to a scramble to clarify what was going on, there are still positives to be found in her clumsy statements.

This week Minister Dunderdale left the impression that Newfoundland and Labrador was contemplating legal action against the Federal and Quebec governments related to the lopsided Upper Churchill power contract. This afternoon she clarified her position in front of the media.

Since coming on stream decades ago, the estimated direct revenue to Newfoundland and Labrador, from the Upper Churchill hydro electric project in Labrador, is estimated at $1 billion. In that time Quebec has garnered $19 billion, plus untold secondary revenues from business and industry attracted to that province by the abundant power. Ottawa has also been greatly enriched by the taxes generated there.

The situation has long raised the ire of the people of Newfoundland and Labrador and has become a rallying point for anti-Canadian/Quebec sentiments over the years.

In a press conference this afternoon, also attended by Newfoundland and Labrador Justice Minister Jerome Kennedy, the official line was that the Williams government was in fact not considering direct legal action at the present time but was instead investigating ways to assist the Labrador Innu in their recent demands for redress over lands lost during the decades old development.

In the past Newfoundland and Labrador tried on several occasions to re-open the one sided contract, at one point bringing it to the Supreme Court of Canada, without success.

However in recent years new evidence has come to light that, at the time the contract was inked, a board member for Quebec Hydro also sat on the board of the company developing the project in Newfoundland and Labrador. As a result it is believed Quebec Hydro had inside information to the effect that the project was only weeks from bankruptcy if a deal, any deal, were not signed immediately.

The federal government of the day, which had the authority to prevent Newfoundland and Labrador from being put in this precarious situation, refused to support requests to wheel power to markets through Quebec at fair market rates, leaving Newfoundland and Labrador at the mercy of the larger province.

The resulting contract has seen Quebec reap massive profits and in coming years will actually see Quebec Hydro utilize Upper Churchill power at a fraction of the obscenely low price it has been paying for decades. An amount that was below market value even 40 years ago.

Last week the people of Newfoundland and Labrador once again relived the facts of the situation when a spokesman for the Labrador Innu Nation publicly stated that new developments being planned for the Lower Churchill River, and requiring the agreement of the Innu people, would be blocked unless full redress for land losses from the earlier project were forthcoming.

Premier Williams noted that his government was not in a position to make good on losses suffered by the Innu since Newfoundland and Labrador itself had also suffered greatly from the situation and had not received any redress from the real beneficiaries of the project, Quebec and Ottawa.

It was these events that precipitated today's press conference. A scrum in which the Ministers noted that, rather than persuing legal action against Quebec and Ottawa, the Newfoundland and Labrador government was assisting the Innu in their efforts to determine which levels of government were libel for compensation, revenue sharing or other forms of redress to the native group. In doing so they also intend to factually determine who has benefited from the project and to what degree.

The Ministers said any legal action that might be taken would likely be initiated by the Innu people, not the province.

There are two old sayings that quickly come to mind in this situation.

"A smart politician can fall into crap and come out smelling like a rose" and “You don’t butt heads with native peoples during an election campaign”.

It seems clear Premier Danny Williams must have heard both of these sayings at some point in his life and took them to heart.

While the next election in Newfoundland and Labrador is still several years away, there is an axe perpetually hanging over the head of the current government in Ottawa. As a result the timing couldn’t be more fortuitous for the Innu people or the government of Newfoundland and Labrador, which already has Stephen Harper firmly in its crosshairs.

Over the years it's always been easy for the governments of Canada and Quebec to downplay, brush aside and laugh off any concerns around the Upper Churchill, or anything else, expressed by the people of Newfoundland and Labrador. The Labrador Innu may not be as easy to dismiss without a public backlash.

In one politically astute move the Williams government has taken a potential negative and turned it to their advantage.

The situation, which initially appeared to be the start of a battle between Williams and the Innu leadership has instead provided an opportunity to work in partnership and to very publicly support the Innu in their efforts. It also allows Newfoundland and Labrador, working with the Innu, to finally put the true story of the Upper Churchill project on the lips of the Canadian people. Something that has never before happened.

By assisting the Innu people the government of Newfoundland and Labrador finds itself in a position where it can once again legitimately begin delving into the circumstances of the Upper Churchill contract, and its ramifications, without the appearance of acting in its own self interests.

The Innu, in support of their cause will be better able to apply public pressure on the Federal government than the province ever could. The Innu have the ability to gain far more sympathy over the Upper Churchill, via the national media, than Newfoundland and Labrador would.

They can also assist themselves, as they already have, by threatening to block the development of power on the Lower Churchill. Electricity desperately needed in power hungry Ontario and the Maritimes.

For the Innu, the people of Newfoundland and Labrador and the Williams government the situation, as ineptly as it was handled by one Minister this week, may yet prove to have an big upside. For the Harper government and for the national perception of Quebec the opposite is true.

8 comments:

  1. Boy, are you ever wrong. What a dumb piece of pseudo-nationialist raving. The wheels have come off Williams' wagon, and the fact that another minister looks like a moron, is a signal of Danny's incompetence. Come on, the Williams Government has become the ultimate Newfie joke.

    ReplyDelete
  2. They had better be prepared to go all the way to the international court at Dahague. Because the Supreme kangaroo Court of canada with it's three judges from each of the two majority provinces ON/QU will just continue to discriminate against the minority provinces.

    They had better elicit support from all of the native organizations across this phony federation because to my knowledge the riding of Labrador has never in it's 59 years of being a part of canada elected anything but a Liberal MP?

    Hapless Harpers hopes for a break through in Quebec's 75 seats would probably really be the contentious issue. Expose Quebec for it's dog in the manger attitude and the national parties complacency in defending a minority provinces rights within this phony federation.

    The new evidence Myles speaks of is a report done by the Harris centre at MUN called Origins of an impending Crisis which investigates the time line and negotiations that led up to the final contract.

    There was a conflict of interest by Hydro Quebec and they were told as much at the time but it was sanctioned by the powers that be at the time. There was an escalator clause included in the earlier MOU's. The extension came about as a result of cohersion and wasn't in any of the earlier MOU's.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I love how every time something happens that might (just might) work in NLs favor the federalists suddenly come out of the woodwork like termites to start the neo-nationalist name calling.

    Keep it up folks, every time these guys show up to "stand up for Canada" or crap on NL it clearly means you've hit a raw nerve. Good on ya.

    ReplyDelete
  4. MYLES - I sent a previous comment with the same subject matter, but I don't think it registered on you site if it did, please ignore this one.

    ------------------------------


    I wonder if the outrageously inequitable Upper Churchill Hydroelectric Energy Contract, that the province of Newfoundland and Labrador holds with Quebec Hydro, have anything to do with the possibility that the province of Newfoundland and Labrador never has had, in its 59 year history of being part of Canada, a judge appointed to the Supreme Court of Canada? Everyone knows that we are grossly unsatisfied over that deal in this province and would like to see matters made more equal.

    Is there anyone else out there who shares my opinion?

    ReplyDelete
  5. May 26, 2008 9:55 PM ,

    " has become the ultimate Newfie joke."

    OK ,Bacon Boy .See how far the level of intelligent conversion can fall Myles when you start the post with the arm pits of Canada leading the way.

    A truely sad way to start a healthy discussion on such a fine piece of writing Myles.I really don't know if I should comment on the excellent topic and the way it was approached or condem the blog for allowing such a blatant racist to start the conversion.

    I can say that it's always intersting to see how my fellow Newfoundlander's and Labradorian's react to it .

    As Always Patriot ,a fine piece of truth !!!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Myles it is your blog and ultimately it is your right to disallow the word N*wf*e to appear in the writings on your blog.

    You wrote an article recently where you thrashed the word. Now Myles it would be great if you made it redundant on your blog as well.

    Myles, it is your blog and you definitely have the power to do so.

    I challenge you Myles and the followers of your great blog to make it happen! We can do it Myles, We Can!

    ReplyDelete
  7. To Anon 10:24,

    Thanks for challenging me on why I would allow someone to use our very own "N" word on this site. As you noted, I have railed against that word in the past and dispise its use.

    Having said that, there are times when I allow comments containing it to be posted (though I do filter out others).

    In my defence, I generally don't allow it to appear unless it is used within a comment that is at least somewhat related to the topic at hand. In other words, not just in some unrelated rant against NLers.

    In the case you are speaking of the word was used by someone who had a directly opposed view to my own on the subject. The use of the word in the comment was something I was willing to post since it helped show the ignorance of the person making the overall statement. In doing so showed the level of intelligence (or lack there of) that this person was exhibiting.

    It's sort of like using the general character of a person to make the point that anything they say should be viewed in the context of that person's level of believability and credibility.

    I hope this clarifies my position.

    Thanks for the comment.

    Myles

    ReplyDelete
  8. Hmmmm.... is it "racism" when one is a member of the same group? you have assumed that I am a CFA, not true!! my NF genes go way back..
    I am unintelligent because I disagree with your views? to summarize, you suggest that Williams Government is smart, even though it flubbed its lines, because they now support Innu seeking reparations.. seems like the same old saw about getting someone else to pay NL's bills and never, ever, ever admitting that we screwed up; to emphasize the point, Quebec and Canada did not flood Innu lands, we did!! so, yes your (and the Williams' Government) "take" on the Innu point is a pathetic joke

    ReplyDelete

Guidelines to follow when making a comment:

1) Comment on the topic
2) Do not provide personal information on anyone,
3) Do not name anyone unless they are publicly connected with the topic
4) No personal attacks please

Due to a high volume of computer generated spam entering the comments section I have had to re-institute the comment word verification feature.