Monday, September 11, 2006

Judge Blasts Feds and DFO

Congratulations and a big pat on the back to Justice Bruce Short of the Newfoundland and Labrador Provincial court for having the courage and insight to take both the federal government and Department of Fisheries and Oceans to task on fisheries legislation and mismanagement.

In the trial of a local man charged with illegally fishing during last year’s fisheries protest, Judge Short noted that he had no choice under current legislation but to find the man guilty, however he opted to impose the lowest fine precedent would permit, $200. The judge also told the defendant that, had precedent allowed him to do it, he would have imposed an even lower amount.

In his remarks the judge went on to say, in essence, that the real problems in the fisheries were not being caused by individuals catching a few fish for the table but by government mismanagement and a total lack of understanding on fisheries matters by the powers that be. He identified foreign overfishing and bottom trawling as two main contributors to the decline of stocks and voiced his belief that either regulators did not value the resource or saw it as less valuable than something else and were willing to trade it away.

According to Judge Short, fisheries legislators and the legislation itself are an insult to the people in the Province and that Newfoundlanders and Labradorians often are the focus of laws that would be better targeted in other directions.

Thank-you Judge Short. If others in positions such as yours had half the courage and strength of character you have exhibited in this matter Newfoundland and Labrador would quickly become a much better place for all of us to live.

7 comments:

  1. Patriot Thank You for writing this post.

    This is what was missing in Newfoundland and Labrador in the past, the voices of Judges and Lawyers, who were honest and forthright. If Judges and Lawyers , had spoken out in the past, when they saw things not going the way they should have been, when our resources came up for development and the contracts were being drawn up on our resources, the mistakes that were made would not have been made.

    I truly believe those Judges and Lawyers of the past kept silent because of the "me syndrome". They were afraid of losing patronage contracts from both levels of governments.

    Of course, in return for keeping their mouths shut, they, no doubt, received business that put a fortune into their pockets for doing so and kept the province of Newfoundland and Labrador forever poor. What a corrupt world. It has been especially corrupt when it came to Newfoundland and Labrador's resources. My God how much Trust did my family put in those damn politicians and Lawmakers and what did we get in return. A bloody boot out of Newfoundland and Labrador to work our resources outside of the province, instead of inside of it. Shocking indeed.

    Thank You Judge Short. After all these years, we finally had one Judge appointed to the Bench, who has morals instead of the "me syndrome". You are to be commended Sir for your decision last week, and you have done Labrador and Newfoundland a great deed. Keep up the great work Sir, maybe you should be our next Premier, after Premier Danny Williams has done all the good that he can do for this province.

    ReplyDelete
  2. My first post I made a mistake and said "when our resources came up for development and the contracts were being drawn up on our resources, the mistakes that were made would not have been made."

    I should have said that they were not mistakes, it was all orchestrated and the resources were dealt out the way politicians and lawyers wanted them to be dealt out.

    Not for the life of me do I thing we could have made so many mistakes with our resources.

    You think we would have learnt when we gave away the first resource and we saw we weren't getting anything out of it. Our politicians and lawyers should have said then and there "Never Again" from now on we will do what is right for our people. Our resources will benefit Newfoundland and Labrador first.... Labrador and Newfoundland will be the primary beneficiary.

    ReplyDelete
  3. It's good to see that there is someone around that actually has balls. Judge Short should be thanked, it's nice to observe the occasional ray of hope.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hats off the Judge Short. Too bad there ain't more of your type.

    ReplyDelete
  5. A true Patriot!

    Thank-You Judge Bruce!

    And thank the fisher Archibald Collins who is going to take this to the next level the stacked Supreme court of Canada. 3 judge from Ontario 3 from Quebec and 3 from the colonies.

    Here is the Article from the Independant

    Editor’s note: Judge Bruce Short made
    the following remarks in Gander
    provincial court on Sept. 6 in the case
    of Archibald Collins, 75, of Hare Bay.
    Collins pleaded guilty to catching cod
    during 2005’s illegal food fishery.
    I’m going to make a couple of comments
    which I think in all fairness
    someone should make, and I guess
    I haven’t been a position where I suppose
    I can make them. It does strike me
    a little bit odd at times, and I’m perhaps
    not familiar enough with the fishery to
    comment in any great extent, but it
    does seem to me to some degree that
    this particular province, for whatever
    reason at times, seems to bear the brunt
    of regulations which might properly be
    placed in other areas.
    Everyone knows that our fishery, you
    know, essentially got destroyed. There
    is some debate as to why it got
    destroyed but from my perspective I’m
    going to basically offer these comments.
    First and foremost, it’s no secret
    that foreign vessels are just absolutely
    raping the stocks just outside of our
    limit and one has to question why that’s
    been allowed to continue for years and
    years.
    One would think logically enough
    that if the country felt that the resource
    had any value whatsoever, that the
    country would be significantly more
    diligent in protecting that resource.
    One could only reasonably conclude, it
    seems to me, that the trade off is that
    the country is getting something else
    that it considers more valuable and I
    think that’s sad. From my point of view
    it shows disrespect for this province
    and that’s abundantly clear.
    Our fish is getting traded off for
    other things that presumably benefit
    other provinces and cause this province
    to suffer and never, ever should happen.
    The second comment I’ll make and
    I’m sure there are different views on
    this but it seems to me that if you have
    a resource such as fish — and I won’t
    make any differentiation between fish
    and trees and anything else — that if
    they develop equipment that can basically
    take all of the fish out of the ocean
    in a very short period of time and you
    don’t do anything to prohibit that from
    happening, it seems to be reasonable
    enough for anyone to conclude that
    after a while you’re not going to have
    any fish.
    I have always been of the view —
    and that does not seem to be a view that
    was held by the regulators — that it’s a
    whole lot better for a significant number
    of people to make a decent living
    off a resource than a small number of
    people to make a fortune. That, unfortunately,
    is something that we just don’t
    seem to get here and that to me is a significant
    reason why we don’t have any
    fish.
    If you look at Iceland their fishery
    has been fine, it’s been fine all along
    and people are still making a good living
    off that. I recognize the state of the
    law at the time that Mr. Collins committed
    this offence and obviously, Mr.
    Collins, you breached the law and I
    mean that’s the bottom line and I don’t
    begrudge the fisheries officers for one
    minute fom enforcing the law.
    But what it seems to me — and I do
    have to say that from the court’s standpoint
    it’s extremely aggravating and
    extremely frustrating — that it seems to
    me that people who have no knowledge
    whatsoever of the fishery, have no history
    or connection with the fishery
    whatsoever and who are so far removed
    from the immediacy of the fishery, are
    the individuals who get to make the
    rules governing the fishery.
    I don’t have any hesitation in saying
    that from my point of view it’s idiotic,
    it’s not the way that it should be done
    and until we are able to gain much
    more control in the decision-making
    process of our own resource, then it
    seems to me that our resource is not
    going to be properly protected. Having
    said that, the precedent that has been
    pointed out to me where the lowest fine
    imposed was one of $200 and that’s the
    one that I’m going with and I can tell
    you that if a precedent was pointed out
    to me where there was a lower fine than
    that imposed, then I would impose a
    lower fine.
    Not that I condone, by any stretch of
    the imagination, a violation of the law,
    but it does seem to me that people in
    this province have been put in a position
    quite unfairly by the regulators of
    this resource, for the most part, in my
    view at least, either don’t know how to
    properly regulate the resource or quite
    frankly don’t really care to properly
    regulate the resource. That to me is the
    bottom line.
    Collins was fined $200 and given six
    months to pay it.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Just check out DFO's own report on bottom dragging and you'll see that they recognize the impact but still arent doing anything about it.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Sorry, forgot to post the link.

    http://www.livingoceans.org/newsevents/pdfs/SAR-AS2006_025_E.pdf

    ReplyDelete

Guidelines to follow when making a comment:

1) Comment on the topic
2) Do not provide personal information on anyone,
3) Do not name anyone unless they are publicly connected with the topic
4) No personal attacks please

Due to a high volume of computer generated spam entering the comments section I have had to re-institute the comment word verification feature.