Da Legal Stuff...

All commentaries published on Web Talk are the opinions of the contributor(s) only and do not necessarily represent the position of any other individuals, groups or organizations.

Now, with that out of the way...Let's Web Talk.

Friday, May 04, 2007

Poor Johnathon

Transcontinental newspapers published a commentary yesterday I thought you might appreciate. Hopefully some of its points will not be lost on all the anon posters on this site and on other ill informed Canadians.

Enjoy.

Poor Jonathan
By Andy Barker
The Advertiser

Newfoundlanders need hides like elephants in order to thwart off the seemingly endless insulting jokes and disparaging comments.

A few years ago, a Toronto columnist Margaret Wente (Globe and Mail) described Newfoundland as a vast and scenic welfare ghetto. She was not the first upalong to cast snide remarks our way, and sadly she is not the last. Margaret now has the company of a fellow Toronto columnist, Jonathan Kay.

Jonathan is no greenhorn journalist, but an award-winning columnist and editor at the National Post. The native Montrealer is no slouch with metallurgy degrees in engineering from McGill, and a law degree from Yale. He has worked overseas as well as freelanced articles for major U.S. newspapers and magazines.

Jonathan's swipe was an editorial "Maitres chez Newf" in the April 26, National Post. Kay poked fun at the throne speech in which the Williams government expressed its intention that Newfoundland and Labrador be the master of its own house. Kay said that as Canada's poorest province we only survive due to transfers - handouts from Ottawa. Williams he sees as "The surly teenager haranguing his parents over the size of his allowance."

Kay ended with "Either they're rugged individualist proud of their identity and self-reliance. Or they're professional welfare cases, endlessly harassing the rest of us for more handouts."

Poor Jonathan. He has the degrees, awards, and the big job at
the National Post, but he still knows diddly-squat about the Newfoundland economy, people and history.

Jonathan's blatant use welfare, handouts, and allowances all reinforce that jaded image of us as die-hard lazy lushes, out of work, and on the bum as usual. Welfare, handouts, and allowances paint a totally false picture of the Newfoundland economy.

If poor Jonathan had done a little googling, he could have easily learned that our unemployment rate, which can spike upwards due to the seasonal fisheries, is now at 14 per cent. But a minimum of 80 per cent of our work force works year round, year in, year out. Our weekly earnings are nearly in fourth place, and our hot economy (oil driven) is one of the national leaders with an 8.5 per cent growth rate. As well, in 1997-98 we depended upon Ottawa for nearly 44 per cent of our budget. But in the 2007-8 budget estimates we are indeed becoming masters of our house with Ottawa's share now down to less than 29 per cent.

Last year we poor Newfoundlanders managed to spend $6 billion
on retail products that were either manufactured or distributed from Ontario and Quebec. That retail spending will no doubt increase this year due to the tax cuts, and our oil, mining, fishing, and forestry industries will continue to buy all sorts of equipment and parts from the mainland. We keep a goodly chunk of the crowd upalong in a job - and that's surely good- as well as fatten the profits at corporate head offices in Toronto and Montreal.

As a foreign exchange earner Newfoundland has always been one of the tops since 1949. Yankee money poured in here via their four military bases, plus we exported minerals, newsprint, and fish to them and to overseas markets to earn even more foreign currency.

Many of those same exports are now augmented by offshore oil - in its infancy stage - which is sold into the U.S. market. Nickel exports from Labrador with the likelihood of more mines in Labrador and on the island bode well for future exports.

And Labrador's lower Churchill (the upper Churchill is a huge profit maker for Jonathan's native Quebec) has the juice that Ontario Hydro would love to have. Even the fisheries with all its woes still earns a good buck for the national economy. And not to be forgotten are the millions earned each year by Navcan as hundreds of daily flights, to and from Europe, as they crisscross our sky.

On top of the wealth that is generated here, Newfoundlanders upalong are doing fine. Imagine the state of the Alberta and Ontario economies if migrant Newfoundlanders put down their tools be it the wrench, shovel, stethoscope, or laptop and came home? Image the chaos in the armed forces if General Rick Hillier and the thousands of his fellow Newfoundlanders suddenly retired? And how dull would the Canadian airwaves be without the likes of Rex Murphy, Rick Mercer, Bob Cole, and Mary Walsh?

Maitre chez nous - masters of our own house - was Quebec's quiet revolution rallying cry. But unlike Newfoundland, Quebec was never a nation. Perhaps poor Jonathan is unaware that we had our own prime ministers, army, currency, stamps, customs office, Rhodes scholar designation, and our own war memorial in France. Even Canada's Vimy memorial was designed by Walter Allward the son of Newfoundlanders who moved to Toronto many years ago.

If the well educated, like poor Jonathan, can't get their facts straight and do a good critical analysis, then the common folk uplong must believe that what is said about us, must be true.

Perhaps, that ingrained, prolonged, disparaging attitude towards us, steeped into the mainland conscious, nurtured by erroneous writers, will force us to opt for nationhood once again.

But this time, along with our pride, we have the wealth in so many ways be it the environment, education facilities, the arts community, and an ever-growing robust economy to go it, alone. And, dear poor Jonathan, Canada would be the biggest looser - not us!

219 comments:

«Oldest   ‹Older   201 – 219 of 219
Patriot said...

Ha, Ha, I live it Ed. It looks like you win the PWG.

I'm not kidding and I hope you aren't either (about accepting it).

Just email the delivery details to higginsmyles@yahoo.ca and I'll have it sent out.

Good on ya!!

Starrigan said...

What a waste of a flag :0(

As for Deirdre, I not only referred to you as Simons Mrs. I also called you by name, and spelled it correctly. But of course you passed that over. Anyway WJM was successful in dragging Myles into a discussion about what should and shouldn't be allowed. Cause for a celebration there for sure.

I highly recommend that anyone reading these posts should just arrow past postings by Ottawally, Crazy Eddy and Simple Simons Mrs. That way you won't get sucked into responding to their inane line of questioning. Let's keep to the topic that we want to discuss.

Oh and before I forget, Ottawally is an a$$hole. Crazy Eddy you're an a$$hole too.

Anonymous said...

Great, Starrigan. You can spell.

Anonymous said...

did i read right? is starrigan proposing censorship? dont read some peoples stuff because they wrote it? what about free speech?

WJM said...

Here is the the so called threat which won't be removed because it doesn't threaten your life or physical well being at all:

"...Don't get use to living in the "BIG LAND" ,cause were your going ,the view won't be that good .


Myles: read the last sentence.

Read it again.

And then read it again.

Read in in conjunction with the "death penalty" line.

More offline.

Simon Lono said...

I am only posting a remark here to make some things very clear:

1) I did not withdraw my comments from this site out of any sense of regret. I withdraw my posts out of disgust and frustration with a pointless, empty, potentially endless set of exchanges;

2) I am disengaging from exchanges with those who are so proud of the positions they take that they will only post under cover of anonymity - they are cowards who are only brave behind masks. The hypocrisy in this forum is offensive;

3) I will take on any person in any forum on the issue of nationalism and its role in the future of this province - just let me know and I will be there. I will even make every effort to help organise it, publicise it and help ensure success.

Then maybe we can finally clarify some issues about what is right and proper and best for our province and the people who are left living in it.

From what I have seen so far, however, I am not holding my breath that anyone around here is ready to come to the plate.

Too bad there is nobody ready to champion the cause that those here seem to hold so dear. Really makes you wonder if it is all just posturing for the cheap seats.

Unless and until somebody is willing to stand up, take the podium and actually stand up for what they profess to believe in, do not bother me again - I am not interested.

Anonymous said...

Wanna expand without any hassle? Hire a KPO.

Whether You Want …
To expand without any hassle?
Temporary employees who are ready to work around the clock?
To minimize management hassles?
To increase your profits with reduced cost?
Then it’s time to search for an IT outsourcing / KPO company in order to achieve all above positive aspects.

Your search ends here at interactive web connects…

Comprehensive range of KPO services
We try our best to strengthen your customer interaction using variety of web tools. We specialize in supporting your company

at back end in efficient way. Many companies are outsourcing their support work to us, Try us once and see the difference...

Interactive Web Connects
http://www.iwebconnects.com/

Anonymous said...

Artfull Dodger said....

Hi Simon, I just feel I have to say, if you don't wish to respond to anon posters fine, why bother complaining about it.

This is a BLOG which affords an opportunity for ordinary people to offer an opinion on topics primarily related to issues unique to this province. Yes you are going to get some posters using profanity or who just plain troll for indignant responses, but that is one of the unfortunate side effects when you have an OPEN forum for discussion or opinion. Some blogs only accept feedback from registered and approved members, which is completely up to the owner of the blog of course, but please don't come to a blog such as this and complain that the rules don't suit you (WJM and Ed Hollett). People don't like to be muzzled or told that their opinion is not worthy. I understand that you are a top notch debater and I have much admiration for those who can turn a phrase or enthrall an audience whith their oratory prowess, unfortunately we all do not have that gift, so please bear with those of us who struggle a little bit to get a point accross.

One other thing, I understand that you are involved with the liberal party. When a person such as myself (non-partisan) reads critical remarks from people such as yourself (partisan), that are directed towards persons or a political party which differs in ideology from the party you are aligned with, we non-partisans will read those remarks with a cautious eye. There is nothing wrong with criticism, however we non-partisans always have to keep in mind the source of the criticism, and need to consider if the criticism is genuine or merely criricism for criticism's sake. It is always a good idea to keep the bullshit meter turned on in such cases.


Regards

Artfull Dodger

Starrigan said...

Thanks for posting that remark Simple Simon, we were hoping that we would hear back from you because we all missed you so. I'm a tad puzzled, if this blog is a worthless waste of time, why did you even bother to post that last remark? Just goes to show that you are an even bigger a$$hole than I first thought. You say you "withdrew your posts out of a sense of disgust and frustration", oh I think not bonehead, you withdrew them because you realized what an incredibly ignorant and insulting statement it was. Fortunately some of us have saved your little freak show and will be quoting it on some other blogs just so people will know much of an a$$hole you really are. Well done. You would think that a man of your experience and background would know better. But no you, thanks for showing your real stripes. As Borat would say "thatsa nice".

Starrigan said...

and before I forget, Crazy Eddy and Ottawally are also huge a$$holes.

Anonymous said...

starigan, how come you spend so much time talking about assholes?

You must have some kind of fixation for them.

Anonymous said...

i wondered about that. starrigan is mostly fixated on Ed and Wallys a$$holes. why?

Starrigan said...

Good one anonymous, very clever remark, well thought out, creative.
I'll try to explain, but without the use of finger puppets it may be difficult to get it through to you.

You see I'm not referring to an actual part, I'm referring to a characteristic. (am I going to fast), take a breath, re-read what I just wrote. There you go, well done. You see they aren't really big wrinkly orifices, that would just be silly now wouldn't it. I want you to stop again and get that nasty picture of an orifice out of your head. There you are, good boy. We're all so proud of you. Now go back to what I said about characteristic, it's a big word so take you time, go through it one syllable at a time. Nicely done.
You see Ottawally and Crazy Eddy act like a$$holes, now get the big wrinkly orifice picture back in your head, very good, now pretend that the orifice part is a mouth and imagine Ottawally's or Crazy Eddies voice coming out of it. See isn't that funny, come on, it's hilarious. Two big a$$holes blabbing away about nothing of importance, cracks me up.

So let's review, a$$hole is a characteristic of these people not an actual body part. Give it some thought, re-read everything I've posted and I'm sure you'll get, I really am.

And before I forget, Ottawally and Crazy Eddy are big a$$holes.

Anonymous said...

Maybe starrigan talks about what he knows the most about.

He talks out of his, so he thinks everyone else does too.

Starrigan said...

Again, very clever. Good come back, why don't you give me you real name and I'll add you to the a$$hole list. Really wouldn't want you to feel left out. A$$hole. LOL

Anonymous said...

give your own real name. unless your mother actually called you starrigan. sauce for the goose, a$$hole.

Anonymous said...

Starrigan: a poor little bent fir tree that is useless

Anonymous said...

starrigan?

a useless bent fir tree?

Noooo.

He's just part of the big conspiracy. he's really just WJM under another name. He comes around here and stirs people up so the regular people here look bad.

He's not usuless at all.

he's just part of the plot.

Starrigan said...

Conspiracy theories, very good. :0)

«Oldest ‹Older   201 – 219 of 219   Newer› Newest»